🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.